Le 26/11/2010 20:50, Michael Meeks a écrit : > On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 15:52 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: >> we are getting close to the first release candidate and final release. > :-) > >> Feel free to update it or propose improvements. Especially, I am not >> sure about bugs in localizations. > So - I tend to think that time will tell if we need to change this. The > seven day period seems long to me. Seven days is a not so long period when you have to organize manual testing. As you can see with OOo 3.3.0 the last stoppers have been found by testers not by automatic tests. > My feeling is that - possibly we need > different classes of release point-zeros that are less stable (as long > as we release note problems it's fine), and then micro releases that are > more stable (or something) ? Perhaps, if micro releases are really only bug fix. But that need to be clearly explained to the users and sys-admin in charge of deployment of LibO.
It is very important that the user installing the next release of LibO can say: Oh there is less bug in LibO than in ... Best regards JBF -- Seuls des formats ouverts peuvent assurer la pérennité de vos documents. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
