On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 10:59 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > On 12/04/2010 09:49 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > > I wouldn't like to see too much effort spent on binfilter though. > I understand the point. On the other side, leting it behind generate a > lot of - not very useful - job when wanting to do global changes, like > the RTL_CONST... macro, or getting ride of old type / classes,... ?
All true. It was just a note that it might be easier, if you have an interest in binfilter, to just take the conservative approach and silence warnings with e.g converting foo(int unused) { } to just foo(int /*unused*/) { } rather than have to go digging to see if removing arguments, or removing methods, would cause a different method from a superclass to be used instead. C. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice