Indeed the 2616 is more detailed. I totally agree in MHD be fully compatible with the 723x rfcs.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Christian Grothoff <[email protected]> wrote: > That's because RFC 2616 describes the mechanism concisely and for the > first time. However, what is implemented should, to the best of my > knowledge, be fully compatible with the 723x-RFCs as well. > > On 09/15/2016 06:06 PM, silvioprog wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm not sure but it seems that rfc 2616 was deprecated by > > rfcs 723X. Could anyone confirm this? > > > > I opened some 723x, eg: 7230, 7231, 7232 etc., and they have the > > "Obsoletes: 2616" header. > > > > Thank you! > -- Silvio Clécio
