Hi, On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 02:13:08PM +0100, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> Well, inside the code you will have two versions, one for GnuTLS and one > for OpenSSL. The patch will be cleaner and simpler if it doesn't end up > being an #ifdef nightmare, but instead uses a clean API towards SSL > backends. I don't mind refactoring -- though I obviously can't talk anything specific here until I gain some grasp of the code. It's the dynamic loading idea that I really don't feel like implementing... I'd leave that to anyone who has an actual use case for it. -antrik-
