On Wednesday, November 04, 2015 11:30:37 AM Olaf Buddenhagen wrote: > My employer considers implementing optional support for openssl as an > alternative to gnutls in libmicrohttpd, as CoreOS apparently doesn't > want to ship any SSL library besides openssl. So I need to solicit some > feedback on whether anyone else would be interested in having openssl > support?
Note this would violate the LGPL license that libmicrohttpd uses, thus you would be unable to legally distribute it without getting an exemption from every copyright holder. Luke
