On 6/1/23 13:18, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > [Sorry, not read the other replies yet, in meetings all day today] > > On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 05:13:58PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> To start with I have opened a discussion topic. We can think about >> opening bugs later. >> >> https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/ocaml-heap-fsck-and-forcing-collection-of-unreachable-objects/12281 > > There were some replies to this thread. One open merge request is > notable - it adds compaction back: > > https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/12193 > > although only for "small" blocks, less than 128 * 8-byte words, which > probably covers everything we do.
We likely don't have a structure type larger than 1KB :) > It seems like full_major is the way to force freeing of unreachable > objects, in all versions of OCaml. Ah, does that mean we don't need a version check here, after all? IIRC, you said that in OCaml 4, "compact" was a superset of "full_major". If "full_major" is sufficient for finalizing unreachable objects on OCaml 4 too, then we can downgrade "compact" to "full_major" regardless of OCaml version. Laszlo _______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list Libguestfs@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
