Hi,
i pushed branch "joliet_multi_extent" with a new commit
cb03533aaba6113465b19157577e631e26406c7e
"Add test for proper handling of multi-extent files in the Joliet tree"
Please review and/or test.
Especially
(cd test && ./check_multiextent.sh )
should report:
-- ./check_multiextent.sh: ISO 9660 + Rock Ridge multiextent listing test ok.
-- ./check_multiextent.sh: ISO 9660 + Rock Ridge multiextent read test ok.
-- ./check_multiextent.sh: Joliet multiextent listing test ok.
-- ./check_multiextent.sh: Joliet multiextent read test ok.
I tested that this branch can be merged into a branch made from "master"
(15801fb), compiles, and yields above test result.
Rocky Bernstein wrote:
> BTW, when creating ISO
> images please try to use the smallest amount of data that will do the job.
That's why i hack xorriso before making the test ISOs.
Normally a multi-extent ISO would be at least 4 GiB large.
The overhead of the old multi_extent_8k.iso consists entirely of zeros.
So within git and tar.gz there should be nearly no cost. Nevertheless
it is worthwhile to avoid those zeros.
So i made a new one by:
xorriso -compliance no_emul_toc -padding 0 -joliet off -rockridge on \
-outdev test/data/multi_extent_8k.iso \
-map test/data/multi_extent_file /multi_extent_file
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
