On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:42:03AM +0100, Kaleb van Ingen Schenau wrote:
> Hi, and thanks for the respond
>
> Throughout the book i've encountered 0 problems or errors and everything
> goes according to the book. It just seems weird that everything works as
> intended at chapter 6.10 then somewhere between that and compiling
> bin-utils and GCC it messes up somewhere, could this be something that i
> maybe mistyped earlier and i'm not experiencing the effects from. (Note
> that EVERY test till this point have been 100% accurate to what to book
> states it should be)
> But to anwser your questions:
> >>Then when i run:
> > >#grep 'SEARCH.*/usr/lib' dummy.log |sed 's|; |\n|g'
> >> SEARCH_DIR("/tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib")
> >> SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib")
> >> SEARCH_DIR("/lib");
> >>
> >> which is also not correct
>
> >That seems to be correct - please compare it to the book - 3
> >matches, for /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu, /usr/lib, /lib. For this
> >part I don't see any error - please point it out if I'm wrong!
>
> The book says it should be:
> SEARCH_DIR("/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib")
> SEARCH_DIR("/usr/local/lib")
> SEARCH_DIR("/lib")
> SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib");
>
> So I'm somehow still pointing to /tools while it seems that i should be
> searching in /usr and /lib, i think this might a main reason why it isn't
> working.
>
You were right all along, it doesn't match : I'll have to blame the
prescription painkillers I'm on (only ibuprofen and paracetomol!).
Sorry, no idea how I misread what the book says.
> >Are you doing something unusual ? That probably includes building
> >on a virtual machine, using the package_users hint, and building on
> >mingw or whatever on windows. Or using minimalist packages (dash,
> >busybox). If this is a straight build linux from linux, did you
> >check the host against the Host System Requirements in the preface ?
>
> I'm building on a virtual PC running Centos 6.3 which i think fit the Host
> System Requirements, other then that I'm not using anything the book
> doesn't tell me to and i haven't skipped anything, I'm just doing what the
> book is telling me to do. Have the logs been of any help maybe?
> pastebin.com/dCjzz5yb <<---- or is there anything else i can supply you
> with to help me?
>
[ snipping my original reply below this - please don't top post, and
trim what you are replying to. ]
I've no idea about virtual machines, maybe someone else can offer
suggestions about specific changes (if any) needed - but I don't
recall seeing problems from them apart from selecting the right
kernel options.
So to recap, hopefully correctly - your include directories from
gcc are not as expected, and the SEARCH_DIRs begin in /tools.
That last point is correct for 6.10 (hmm, maybe I was looking there
instead of 6.17 when I replied).
Going back to check my _own_ (64-bit) logs from 7.2 (with a lot of
things collected up), in 6.10 I see that I have:
ignoring nonexistent directory
"/tools/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.1/../../../../x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include"
ignoring duplicate directory "/tools/include"
#include "..." search starts here:
#include <...> search starts here:
/usr/include
/tools/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.1/include
/tools/include
/tools/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.1/include-fixed
and
SEARCH_DIR("/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib64");
SEARCH_DIR("/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib");
SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib"); SEARCH_DIR("/lib");
(this time, word-wrapping has mad a long line become 3 individual
lines).
I *think* that looks as if your results at the end of 6.17 match,
or are at least similar to, your results in 6.10 ? Is it possible
that you omitted 'make install' after running the tests on gcc ?
Other than that, I'm again out of ideas.
ĸen
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
