Lewis Pike wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Yes. That's due to a change in timezone data and adding leap >> seconds in glibc. The tests have not caught up with the changes. >> Look at the output of the tests: >> >> -File /lost+found (inode #11, mod time Mon Sep 20 03:26:36 1993) >> +File /lost+found (inode #11, mod time Mon Sep 20 03:26:18 1993) >> >> Notice the time difference of 18 seconds? I think that's the number >> of leap seconds between Jan 1 1970 and September 1993. > > Digging a bit deeper into the test suits logs does indeed reveal a > difference of 18 seconds on the time stamps. I checked and 18 leap > seconds did occur between the aforementioned dates. > > I tried duplicating the test errors by building and testing > e2fsprogs-1.42.5 on a separate system with glibc-2.16.0 and > tzdata2012c installed. In this case however, all the tests passed. > Why might these tests fail on one system but pass on another if the > versions of e2fsprogs, glibc, and tzdata are the same?
That's a good question, but I don't have an answer. Was the other system LFS? -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
