Lewis Pike wrote: > I'm getting some failures during the e2fsprogs test suite in part 3 of > LFS Version SVN-20120806; revision 9930, to be exact. > > This seems related to ticket #3146 [1] in the bug reports. The report > indicates that the issue has been fixed in svn r9926 with the upgrade > to e2fsprogs-1.42.5. > > I am at r9930 using e2fsprogs-1.42.5 with glibc-2.16.0 but I appear to > have the same issue. > > The test results of e2fsprogs are as follows: > > --------------------------------------------- > 116 tests succeeded 9 tests failed > > Tests failed: f_bbfile f_dup f_dup2 f_dup3 f_dup_ba f_dup_resize > f_dupfsblks f_dupsuper f_extents2 > --------------------------------------------- > > Can anyone provide some insight?
Yes. That's due to a change in timezone data and adding leap seconds in glibc. The tests have not caught up with the changes. Look at the output of the tests: -File /lost+found (inode #11, mod time Mon Sep 20 03:26:36 1993) +File /lost+found (inode #11, mod time Mon Sep 20 03:26:18 1993) Notice the time difference of 18 seconds? I think that's the number of leap seconds between Jan 1 1970 and September 1993. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
