Now -- this is funny, I re-ran: === I have no name!:/sources/glibc-build# make -k check 2>&1 | tee glibc-check-log ==== And it seems to have done OK on the second run...
==== I have no name!:/sources/glibc-build# grep Error glibc-check-log I have no name!:/sources/glibc-build# ===== Weird. --- ==================================== David Scott Williams twitter: @dscott_williams blog: http://deadpenguinsociety.org ==================================== On 29.11.2011 09:49, David Scott Williams wrote: > Actually, this is my entire list: > make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/libio/tst-fopenloc.check] Error > 127 > make[1]: *** [libio/tests] Error 2 > make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/bug-regex32.out] Error 1 > make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored) > make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/bug-regex2-mem] Error 127 > make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/bug-regex14-mem] Error 127 > make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/bug-regex21-mem] Error 127 > make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/bug-regex31-mem] Error 127 > make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/tst-rxspencer-mem] Error 127 > make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/tst-pcre-mem] Error 127 > make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/tst-boost-mem] Error 127 > make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/bug-glob2-mem] Error 127 > make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/tst-vfork3-mem] Error 127 > make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/tst-fnmatch-mem] Error 127 > make[1]: *** [posix/tests] Error 2 > make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/misc/tst-error1-mem] Error 127 > make[1]: *** [misc/tests] Error 2 > make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-stack3-mem] Error 127 > make[1]: *** [nptl/tests] Error 2 > make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/elf/tst-leaks1-mem] Error 127 > make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/elf/noload-mem] Error 127 > make[1]: *** [elf/tests] Error 2 > make: *** [check] Error 2 > > I assume I have failed? > > --- > ==================================== > David Scott Williams > > twitter: @dscott_williams > blog: http://deadpenguinsociety.org > ==================================== > > On 29.11.2011 09:28, David Scott Williams wrote: >> When building and installing (6.9) the glibc ... what test errors >> are >> acceptable? What are the guidelines for determining "quirkiness" >> vs. >> "woops, I screwed up" ? >> >> For example, the following error (and a refusal to finish the make) >> .. >> I assume to be bad: >> make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/elf/noload-mem] Error 127 Scratch >> >> I am in the process of doing it again (re-patch/etc..) and see what >> happens. I am building on a 2.6.32 kernel, and I might very well >> have >> left the 2.6.25 in the copied shell command... >> >> However, I was just wondering what tests, when they fail, are FAIL >> rather than fail;) :) ? >> >> -- >> ==================================== >> David Scott Williams >> >> twitter: @dscott_williams >> blog: http://deadpenguinsociety.org >> ==================================== -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
