Actually, this is my entire list: make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/libio/tst-fopenloc.check] Error 127 make[1]: *** [libio/tests] Error 2 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/bug-regex32.out] Error 1 make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored) make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/bug-regex2-mem] Error 127 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/bug-regex14-mem] Error 127 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/bug-regex21-mem] Error 127 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/bug-regex31-mem] Error 127 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/tst-rxspencer-mem] Error 127 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/tst-pcre-mem] Error 127 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/tst-boost-mem] Error 127 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/bug-glob2-mem] Error 127 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/tst-vfork3-mem] Error 127 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/tst-fnmatch-mem] Error 127 make[1]: *** [posix/tests] Error 2 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/misc/tst-error1-mem] Error 127 make[1]: *** [misc/tests] Error 2 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-stack3-mem] Error 127 make[1]: *** [nptl/tests] Error 2 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/elf/tst-leaks1-mem] Error 127 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/elf/noload-mem] Error 127 make[1]: *** [elf/tests] Error 2 make: *** [check] Error 2
I assume I have failed? --- ==================================== David Scott Williams twitter: @dscott_williams blog: http://deadpenguinsociety.org ==================================== On 29.11.2011 09:28, David Scott Williams wrote: > When building and installing (6.9) the glibc ... what test errors are > acceptable? What are the guidelines for determining "quirkiness" vs. > "woops, I screwed up" ? > > For example, the following error (and a refusal to finish the make) > .. > I assume to be bad: > make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/elf/noload-mem] Error 127 Scratch > > I am in the process of doing it again (re-patch/etc..) and see what > happens. I am building on a 2.6.32 kernel, and I might very well > have > left the 2.6.25 in the copied shell command... > > However, I was just wondering what tests, when they fail, are FAIL > rather than fail;) :) ? > > -- > ==================================== > David Scott Williams > > twitter: @dscott_williams > blog: http://deadpenguinsociety.org > ==================================== -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
