On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 12:53:19 +0100
Ken Moffat <zarniwhoo...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 2 July 2010 01:57, Face <falaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Ken,
> > Well, I am really sorry for all the trouble i caused. I start over
> > b/c i could not fix the earlier Problem, really sorry.
> >
> We're here to build systems. A large part of this is learning
> from our mistakes [ aside: some people claim to build
> LFS without any problems - I don't know how ;-) ].
>
> Someone said that starting again may be the best policy. There
> is some truth in that, but people can make the same error each
> time.
>
> > section 5.8 went Ok (I think) here is the out
> >
> > lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources$ echo 'main(){}' > dummy.c
> > lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources$ $LFS_TGT-gcc -B/tools/lib dummy.c
> > lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources$ readelf -l a.out | grep ': /tools'
> > [Requesting program
> > interpreter: /tools/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2]
> >
>
> That looks ok, so I'm out of ideas. You have a working compiler
> here, but when you call it from a configure script, it doesn't
> create the 'a.out' file. All I can suggest now is that you -
>
> delete the binutils-build and binutils-2.20.1 directories
>
> try section 5.9 again.
>
> If that works, there was probably a typo somewhere.
>
> ĸen
> --
> After tragedy, and farce, "OMG poneys!"
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
I am also new to LFS and doing my first LFS, I have a simple fool method
to ensure I can roll back when run into problem. when I finish one or
more packages, I will backup the $LFS/tools.
--
littlebat
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
