thomas wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2014, 12:33 +0200 schrieb Thierry Nuttens: >> Hello. >> >> I thing its a very good idea to go for a possibility to choose between >> systemd and SySV. Simply because, it's an endless debate, peoples are for >> SySV or for systemD, both parties are convinced by they choice. > > That is for sure true for the phase of building a LFS system but I > cannot see a benefit in having both systems installed in the final OS. > It is not clear to me why I would want to boot once using sysv and once > using systemd. BLFS packages do either use systemd or not, depending in > which environment they are built but I hardly believe that they do it as > a runtime choice. > Can you give me a hint why I should have both on the machine at the same > time? Or did I misunderstood the whole discussion?
Sure. LFS has education as a major objective. Being able to switch allows users to compare for themselves. The amount of space needed for both systems is negligible. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
