DJ Lucas wrote: > > On 03/25/14 11:22, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > First, let me say that I personally love that idea. I feel that LFS was kind > of loosing sight of the primary goal by not introducing systemd. However, are > you suggesting that LFS have optional instructions? That's not bad in itself, > just that it has never been acceptable before. I especially like providing > both > methods (again, primary goal of LFS). Ag has already raised the same point > about > optional instructions before I completed this message. Also, I'm not sure > about > scripting the swap. By all means, provide the instructions to switch, but > leave > the scripting to the user IMO. What about BLFS? Install both sysvinit and unit > files from the single install target from the bootscripts tarball? I'm > unfamiliar with the sysvinit compatibility in systemd, never had a need for > it.
What I have in mind is to install both systems side-by-side and then asking the user to choose one or the other, and then adding a small script to switch between the two methods. The switch for a plain LFS system looks quite doable. I'm not so sure about BLFS packages though. This is a relatively long term project. I'm intentionally going slow so it may be a few weeks before is shows up in the development portion of the book. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
