> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:45:50 -0800 > From: Nathan Coulson <conat...@gmail.com> > To: LFS Developers Mailinglist <lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org> > Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] Systemd branch is alive > . . > to systemd when you were previously working on it (Although sortof a > love/hate relationship with it. I love how it organizes the > bootscripts and orders them, [...]
If that's your principle benefit, then one would question your ROI; and perhaps also wisdom at getting into - and certainly staying in - the transaction, given its entirely predictable consequences. One doesn't need systemd to have rigourous ordering and handling/control of boot scripts: it's easy to spec and parse dependency chains - rather like is done for packages in b/lfs. Sure, some rats-nest software (usually proprietary(-ish), and junk-y) needs a bit more handling (again, analogous to b/lfs): but it's not true that the only way to deal with such rats-nest proprietary junk, is by throwing other rats-nest proprietary junk (as sysd essentially is) at it. > [...] but just not sure if I like it handling > everything it is handling). > . . > rgds, akh -- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page