> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:45:50 -0800
> From: Nathan Coulson <conat...@gmail.com>
> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist <lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org>
> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] Systemd branch is alive
>
        .
        .
> to systemd when you were previously working on it (Although sortof a
> love/hate relationship with it.  I love how it organizes the
> bootscripts and orders them, [...]


If that's your principle benefit, then one would question your ROI; and 
perhaps also wisdom at getting into - and certainly staying in - the 
transaction, given its entirely predictable consequences.


One doesn't need systemd to have rigourous ordering and handling/control 
of boot scripts: it's easy to spec and parse dependency chains - rather 
like is done for packages in b/lfs. Sure, some rats-nest software (usually 
proprietary(-ish), and junk-y) needs a bit more handling (again, analogous 
to b/lfs): but it's not true that the only way to deal with such 
rats-nest proprietary junk, is by throwing other rats-nest proprietary 
junk (as sysd essentially is) at it.


> [...] but just not sure if I like it handling
> everything it is handling).
>
        .
        .
>


rgds,
akh





--
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to