On Sat, 06 Jul 2013 15:22:01 -0500 Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Armin K. wrote: > > On 07/06/2013 09:53 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> Armin K. wrote: > >>> We probably missed this one: > >>> > >>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/hotplug/udev.git/plain/README > >>> > >>> Requirements: > >>> - Version 2.6.34 of the Linux kernel with sysfs, procfs, > >>> signalfd, inotify, unix domain sockets, networking and hotplug > >>> enabled > >> > >> These all seem reasonable. > >> > >>> I suggest we build everything for 2.6.32 kernel from now on > >>> (glibc's --enable-kernel switch). Why 2.6.32? Well, It appears no > >>> distro yet builds with anything higher than that. > >> > >> Setting --enable-kernel='' in glibc only specifies what > >> compatibility to include in the glibc libraries. I have no > >> problems with adjusting it, but think that 2.6.34 would be > >> better. The only reason to not have --enable-kernel=current is to > >> allow users to boot an LFS system with an older kernel. There > >> appears to be a udev requirement for 2.6.34, so it would make > >> sense to me that the --enable-kernel value should be the newer of > >> the distros kernels and udev. Since udev needs 2.6.34, then the > >> user shouldn't try to use the LFS system with a kernel older than > >> that. > >> > > > > Sure, do what you think is okay. I was thinking about the > > > > " --enable-kernel=2.6.25 > > OK, I'll change it to 2.6.34 > Wouldn't be prudent in chapter 5 to set it to the running kernel, so there is less probability of a glitch in chroot. Chapter 6 may be OK. --- Dave -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
