On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 04:57:03PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 07:34:04AM +0200, g....@free.fr wrote: > > > > I am with glibc-2.11 with chroot /etc/localtime as a copy of real > > /etc/localtime. > > > > I don't see test failures in sed. > > The 4 utf8 test report error 1 and XFAIL : utf8-x, so my understanding is > > that is intended they fail > > All 65 tests behaved as expected (4 expected failures) > > > I've had this since forever, the earliest log I can find is from > 2010-06-16. But, it works ok in practice and I normally delete all > directories after a package is built, so I've never had evidence for > what is failing. Now that I'm having to break my scripts to examine > other failures, I thought I'd try to look at all the failures. > > These utf-8 tests are expected to fail on a couple of OS's (hp and > win), and I think they might get treated as XFAIL if you don't have > an ru_RU.UTF-8 locale installed. > > ken@jtm1 ~ $grep -e '^FAIL' -e 'tests\ failed' \ > /home/logs/LFS-7.1-pure64/chroot/sed-4.2.1.log.check > FAIL: utf8-1 > FAIL: utf8-2 > FAIL: utf8-3 > FAIL: utf8-4 > 4 of 65 tests failed > Please report to bug-gnu-ut...@gnu.org > Since I had been able to connect to fedora gitweb, I took a look around [ possibly, it's easier since they stopped putting everything on one page ]. sed is on about page 243, and they have a patch:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sed.git/plain/sed-4.2.1-makecheck.patch which changes various LANG= to LC_ALL= (specifically, it causes the test to override LC_ALL instead of LANG). They've either been doing that since 2009-10-14 (according to the patch) or since 2004 (fedora bug 129014). Either way, it fixes it for me in the finished chroot: root@jtm1 ~$ grep -e 'utf8' -e '=====' -A 2 /logs/LFS-svn-20120813/chroot/sed-4.2.1.log.check PASS: utf8-1 PASS: utf8-2 PASS: utf8-3 PASS: utf8-4 PASS: badenc -- =================== All 65 tests passed =================== make[2]: Leaving directory `/building/sed-4.2.1/testsuite' Bruce - if your build was already ok on sed, do you have the ru_RU.UTF-8 locale installed ? Anybody else here install ru_RU.UTF-8 on recent glibc ? Does sed report 4 tests failed (utf8-*) without the patch ? I also think that ru_RU.UTF-8 locale should be added to "the minimum set of locales necessary for the optimal coverage of tests" in section 6.9 (depending on responses to those questions, obviously) ? ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
