On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:42:40PM +0100, Matt Burgess wrote: > On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 16:18 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > > Thanks. So, why do we do it on 32-bit x86 ? My memory says that > > > Greg proposed it, something along the lines of "it's what upstream > > > recommend", but I could be mistaken. > > > > I can't recall and I don't want to research it right now. > > http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2299 and the related commit at > http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/changeset/8885 - in short Fedora > and DIY did it, so we copied them. > > Regards, > > Matt. > Thanks, Matt - I got as far as r8885 but took a break and didn't find the ticket. I don't particularly care what DIY do or did, but if Fedora did it, well, must be the right thing. So, when is LFS moving to systemd and initrd ? (that will be the time I leave, I think ;-)
But, my current failure to build with -O3 notwithstanding, why only on m486 and not x86_64 ? ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
