On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 22:37:30 +0000 "Gilles Espinasse" <g....@free.fr> wrote:
> > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andrew Benton" <a...@benton.eu.com> > To: <lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org> > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:00 PM > Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] gcc cross patch in pass1 > > > > On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:40:03 +0000 > > Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I'm having a problem with why this is happening. > > > > Me too... > > > > > The jhalfs vanilla LFS > > > svn build worked perfectly for me. > > > > > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/033-gcc-pass1 > > > > Looking at your log I see: > > *** This configuration is not supported in the following subdirectories: > > target-libquadmath gnattools target-libada target-libstdc++-v3 > target-libgfortran target-libgo target-libffi target-zlib target-libjava > target-libobjc target-libgomp target-libmudflap target-libssp > target-boehm-gc > > (Any other directories should still work fine.) > > > > Notice the target-zlib in there? For me I get: > > *** This configuration is not supported in the following subdirectories: > > target-libquadmath target-libstdc++-v3 target-libgomp > target-libmudflap target-libssp > > (Any other directories should still work fine.) > > > > So it would seem that for you, configure sees that target-zlib will not > > work and doesn't try to compile gcc-build/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/zlib > > For me, configure thinks target-zlib will work and it has a go. > > > > Andy > > -- > > If I trust this post > http://www.eglibc.org/archives/patches/msg01051.html > target-zlib should not be build unless building java and that should not be > done on gcc pass1. > > The question should be why target-libgfortran target-libgo target-libffi > target-zlib target-libjava target-libobjc will be build in Andrew > configuration. > Is --enable-languages=c somehow skipped from configure? No. --enable-languages=c is in the script jhalfs made from the LFS xml. target-libgfortran target-libgo target-libffi target-libjava target-libobjc are not built because the source is not available... which led me try a new solution: rm -rf zlib. It worked. I think it's a neater solution than the patch, so I think I'll be doing that in future. Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
