On 3/1/12 3:47 PM, Qrux wrote: > That's good. Smells like common ground. > > So, what are you advocating as far as testing goes? Bruce just brought up a > good point about ownership and accountability. It does seem unclear who > should be testing. What are your thoughts about that, especially in the > context of these types of large changes?
I actually have another idea I'll be proposing in the near future (assuming all tests go well) that should help make full testing easier for everyone. It's not too dissimilar from your triggered test build idea, but the core principle is a little different. But I wasn't ready to go down that path yet and I think it's probably a little radical for this discussion :) JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
