On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 13:28 -0500, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > Hello, > > I believe the cross patch in gcc pass1 is unnecessary. It does hail from > upstream where it seems they accepted the bit about having the option to > disable target libiberty, if required, but I don't believe they accepted > the zlib part, see: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836 > > I can omit the patch and the switches here without it (albeit my build > is a tad different) but I see no problems whatsoever. At the very least > I believe that the statement 'these don't build correctly when cross > compiling' is bogus. > > Matt, did you add this patch because you hit issues? If so, what were > they exactly?
Hi Jeremy, Andy hit issues that were discussed in the thread starting at http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2011-March/064617.html When I have a bit more time, I'll try to build again without the patch, and if others could also do so, that'd be great. Oddly, from that thread, it only seems to affect some people's builds. Cheers, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
