Hello, I believe the cross patch in gcc pass1 is unnecessary. It does hail from upstream where it seems they accepted the bit about having the option to disable target libiberty, if required, but I don't believe they accepted the zlib part, see: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
I can omit the patch and the switches here without it (albeit my build is a tad different) but I see no problems whatsoever. At the very least I believe that the statement 'these don't build correctly when cross compiling' is bogus. Matt, did you add this patch because you hit issues? If so, what were they exactly? Thanks, JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
