Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > I feel it is misleading having a statement "compilation OK" and at > the same time "some requirements not satisfied". Perhaps, instead of > any major changes in the script, a message could be given (or the > previous messages could be changed) to avoid the understanding that > "although some requirements are missing, the script is telling me > that compilation is OK, so I do not have to worry for those previous > warnings, because the system will be able to compile the packages". > What I mean is: perhaps a small modification would avoid > misunderstandings in something that tells OK and missing. > simultaneously.
A simple alternative would be to just put the compilation test first. When we first wrote the script, we didn't have the compilation test at all, so when it was added, it was put at the end. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
