On 09/24/2011 12:22 PM, Kevin Lyda wrote: <snip all of the actual important stuff> > > Anyway, thanks if you read this far and hope the info here was useful. > LFS has been an excellent tool for me at work. You guys have done a > fantastic job. If this is not desired I'm happy to remove it. If > it's useful that's also great. >
Kevin, wow! Thanks for the detailed writeup, it is much appreciated. I vaguely remember a few minor hiccups with the move from CVS to Subversion which our admins at the time worked diligently to fix. This isn't much different from then, and now it seems there are more/better tools to assist with the migration if needs be. That said, Git is probably a little overkill for LFS, but who knows what people will want going forward. At least there is a way to bridge the gap for those who are more comfortable with git. I myself have been using git with repo for managing android development. I'm tracking well over 300 projects right now...no way I'd be able to do that manually with svn. > And if it's offensive/unwanted, please > accept my apologies in advance. > Having copies anywhere and everywhere is kind of the point of distributed version control. Taking it a step further, you have all of the history of that repo, even dating back to CVS, on at least two other boxes now. I cannot possibly fathom how that could be a bad thing. I will probably go through the steps myself just for the learning aspect of it, but yeah, keep it up. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page