Matthew Burgess wrote: > On 02/08/2011 22:16, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> I could ask that the util-linux guys omit /run also. >> >> Alternatively, we could do something like: >> >> [ -d /run/var ] || return >> >> in the appropriate places in functions so the attempt to write is >> skipped if the /run/var directory is missing. >> >> What do you think? > > I think both options are sensible. If you wouldn't mind fixing up the > functions so it checks for /run/var first, that would be good, seeing as > you're Mr Bootscripts at the moment :-)
LOL. I'd like DJ and JH to take a look too. > I see you're also active on the > util-linux mailing list, so it may be worth a post there to see if > they'll entertain the idea of omitting /run. Yes, I'll do that. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
