On 02/08/2011 22:16, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I could ask that the util-linux guys omit /run also. > > Alternatively, we could do something like: > > [ -d /run/var ] || return > > in the appropriate places in functions so the attempt to write is > skipped if the /run/var directory is missing. > > What do you think?
I think both options are sensible. If you wouldn't mind fixing up the functions so it checks for /run/var first, that would be good, seeing as you're Mr Bootscripts at the moment :-) I see you're also active on the util-linux mailing list, so it may be worth a post there to see if they'll entertain the idea of omitting /run. Thanks, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
