On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:26:54 -0500, Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> wrote: > Matthew Burgess wrote: >> >> Thanks for the reports guys. Would you mind running the following > script >> for me please and let me know what you get? On my builds, all 10 of the >> no-patch builds produce the correct built-programs, and all 10 of the >> patch builds produce the incorrect built-programs. > > I'm not sure what I'm looking for. Each pair of programs gives: > > --- built-programs-no-patch-10 2011-04-20 10:57:37.000000000 -0500 > +++ built-programs-patch-10 2011-04-20 11:11:01.000000000 -0500 > @@ -1 +1,4 @@ > + cd .. && /bin/sh ./config.status src/Makefile depfiles > +config.status: creating src/Makefile > +config.status: executing depfiles commands > [ base64 basename cat chcon chgrp chmod chown chroot cksum comm cp > csplit cut date dd df dir dircolors dirname du echo env expand expr > factor false fmt fold ginstall groups head hostid id join link ln > logname ls md5sum mkdir mkfifo mknod mktemp mv nice nl nohup nproc od > paste pathchk pinky pr printenv printf ptx pwd readlink rm rmdir runcon > seq sha1sum sha224sum sha256sum sha384sum sha512sum shred shuf sleep > sort split stat stdbuf stty sum sync tac tail tee test timeout touch tr > true truncate tsort tty uname unexpand uniq unlink users vdir wc who > whoami yes > \ No newline at end of file
Cool, so that has accurately triggered the bug. The problem is, that file should only list the built programs, and those 3 lines at the top will cause the 2 failures in the test suite. I think I'll raise this with coreutils upstream, even though it's a patch they don't use. They're clued up and should be able to tell me why the patch is causing the build system to rebuild src/Makefile. Thanks, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
