On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:34:09 -0400, Jeremy Huntwork <jhuntw...@lightcubesolutions.com> wrote:
> Matt, > > I was hoping to get some feedback from you on this. No thoughts on the > subject? Well, not to be too blunt about it but I don't have too many thoughts on it to be honest :-) I agree that the website is looking dated and could use a new lick of paint. Although I don't personally have a problem with Trac - it seems to do its job well for what we need it for - if moving to redmine enables the site layout to be more easily customised, then I don't have a problem with a move. As far as the site layout itself is concerned, I have a couple of observations, but overall I was impressed; to me it is a clean, consistent design and I couldn't see anything immediately odd in terms of layout/styling. 1) http://community.linuxfromscratch.org/ - This should be a pretty sparse page with just a description of that LFS (the project) aims to do, with a link to each of the sub-project's front pages. 2) http://community.linuxfromscratch.org/projects - I think 'LFS Hints' and 'LFS Patches' should be separate projects, not sub-projects of LFS. I'm not sure that 'Server Administration' should be a publically visible project. I actually think that entire page is superfluous if the suggestion from 1) is implemented, but I guess it's an internal redmine thing? 3) http://community.linuxfromscratch.org/projects/lfs - Could use the text from http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ to describe what it is and why someone would want to read it and get involved. That's about it for now. Apologies for taking so long to get around to addressing your efforts, Jeremy. Regards, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
