Bryan Kadzban schrieb: > > Noting which programs are needed wouldn't be too bad. Moving a lot of > them into LFS, I wouldn't like. Most of the stuff you mentioned is > pretty rarely needed in reality -- or at least, on my system, which is > mostly all I care about. Obviously this is a bit of a skewed > perspective though. :-P >
not only noting which are needed, but one or two sentences about why we currently don't implement them to lfs with an aditional link to blfs if the package is availabe. example for cpio: cpio is needed due to rpm requires it. as we don't support rpm [with link to section why no rpm] we have no need for cpio. buiding a system with initrd [see hint], cpio is required to. cpio[link] is handled in blfs. tobias -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
