Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > Greg, as I have your attention, I'm curious why the -fomit-frame-pointer > change is still present in your second pass of gcc. I thought the > purpose of this was to maintain compatibility between the first > bootstrapped pass of gcc and the second pass?
GCC is no longer bootstrapped. But you still want resulting GCC to be byte-for-byte identical as compared to what it would be if it were bootstrapped. Regards Greg -- http://www.diy-linux.org/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
