Matthew Burgess wrote: > I've already got the trivial patch that upgrades Udev, but doesn't strip out > Udev-config. It's been build-tested but not boot-tested currently. It may > have an impact on the minimum host-kernel pre-req, but I don't have anything > to test on to confirm/deny this. My proposal would be to just chuck it over > the wall and see what breaks - this is trunk after all :-) I certainly don't > think it needs its own branch. > > I think stripping out Udev-Config is fairly safe too - the discrepancies I > flagged may cause some breakage in some esoteric use cases/devices but I > think by and large people will still be able to boot and use LFS-based > systems. Any breakage can be easily rectified by including new rules in an > LFS-format patch, which can then be submitted upstream for their > consideration.
Alright, then I guess this is one of those things you can drop in anytime. Thanks, Matt. -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
