Ken Moffat schrieb:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 04:14:33PM +0100, Tobias Gasser wrote:
> 
> [ not commenting on the main problem, or your seds - I find perl's
> configuration painful enough at the best of times, so I'm chickening
> out for the moment ]

[...]

>  The crypt() function is unimplemented due to excessive paranoia
>  (F) Configure couldn’t find the crypt() function on your machine,
>  probably because your vendor didn’t supply it, probably because
>  they think the U.S. Government thinks it’s a secret, or at least
>  that they will continue to pretend that it is.  And if you quote
>  me on that, I will deny it.
[big grin]


> Do you have /mnt/lfs/usr/include/crypt.h ?
yes! (installed by glibc)

> Is this a native build, or are you running in a vm ?
native

> What is your host system, and which kernel is it running ?
 > /proc/cpuinfo ?

processor       : 0
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 15
model           : 4
model name      : Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.93GHz
stepping        : 1
cpu MHz         : 2927.865
cache size      : 256 KB
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 5
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov
pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe lm
constant_tsc up pebs bts sync_rdtsc pni monitor ds_cpl tm2 cid cx16 xtpr
bogomips        : 5862.84
clflush size    : 64

uname -m: i686
uname -p: pentium4
uname -i: i386


memory: 1gb ram, no swap

kernel 2.6.24 (lfs, february 08)



i never bevor had to add -Dusedl to get dynamic libraries.
the failure in test with dynaloader seem to make the same strange 
assumptions about my system as configure.

the steps in the book produce a failure on 3 out of 3 runs. after 
posting here i got a hint from gilles:

sed -i -e "@[EMAIL PROTECTED] = -lm@" Makefile
now i had 5 out of 5 runs with success, but static. the rest of chapter 
6 was fine, kernel too, and the system booted

the best result i got with the seds as posted. bash scripts are fun: 
last night i had 60 runs, 16 with success, 44 failures (i stopped after 
make, i don't know wether all 16 successes had the 3 failures in the test).



thanks for your help
tobias
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to