You might want to consider examining how Greg Schafer does 32-bit, 64-bit and biarch. It's simple and clean. I just built a biarch system following his instructions to see how it works, and I had no problems.
I haven't using BLFS or CBLFS with it yet to see if there are any problems there. I remember some problems with biarch a couple of years ago. -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > DJ Lucas wrote: > > > >> Bruce, Randy, ya'll got anything to add? > > > > No, not really. On a LUG list I read we just had a long discussion about > > problems on guy had getting his wireless to work with ndis wrapper. He was > > using Ubuntu64 and never could get it to work. When he went to Ubuntu32, > > it > was > > fine. These are the types of problems we run into with 64-bit systems. > > The > > think is, he had no idea why he wanted 64-bits. <snide smile>It has to be > > better than 32-bits, right.</snide smile> > > This probably falls into the category of "Q: Why climb the mountain?" > "A: Because it's there". And for some people, I'd venture to guess that > building LFS at all would be categorized the same way. :) > > But none of that is to say that I disagree with you. I think it's still > a good idea to try to get a reader to rationalize a decision one way or > another. > > -- > JH > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ > Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
