Bruce Dubbs wrote: > DJ Lucas wrote: > >> Bruce, Randy, ya'll got anything to add? > > No, not really. On a LUG list I read we just had a long discussion about > problems on guy had getting his wireless to work with ndis wrapper. He was > using Ubuntu64 and never could get it to work. When he went to Ubuntu32, it > was > fine. These are the types of problems we run into with 64-bit systems. The > think is, he had no idea why he wanted 64-bits. <snide smile>It has to be > better than 32-bits, right.</snide smile>
This probably falls into the category of "Q: Why climb the mountain?" "A: Because it's there". And for some people, I'd venture to guess that building LFS at all would be categorized the same way. :) But none of that is to say that I disagree with you. I think it's still a good idea to try to get a reader to rationalize a decision one way or another. -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
