Bruce Dubbs wrote: > The implication of going to DESTDIR for LFS would imply doing the same > for BLFS. Some of the BLFS packages are not DESTDIR friendly. I can't > remember which ones off the top of my head, but I do recall some that > ignore DESTDIR, at least partially. > > -- Bruce
Openssl springs instantly to mind. If i recall correctly, i also had difficulties with shadow in LFS itself (sorry, it's been a while)... taipan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
