Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > > Unfortunately, the current DocBook toolchain is meant to produce a > single book with instructions that are meant for copying and pasting. > It is not suitable for generating both the non-PM-aware instructions > and spec files from the same source, and is not able to modify the > surrounding text accordingly. Worse, we don't even have a mockup HTML > of how this should look like! > As Gerard suggested, the instructions should not be considered relevant to the content displayed. "Who, What, Why, When and Where". "How" can be discovered by just viewing the (chosen PM) spec and invocation script as they are, plain text. Whether the chosen spec is RPM, DESTDIR or NONE should ideally affect only the "Where" text.
In other words the text could be a simple "toXML markup". Script and PM selection are where the problems are. All supported PM's in all Packages/Modules: That is a great endeavor. That's my take. David Jensen -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
