-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Thomas Pegg wrote: > From what I remember it was so we could mount /dev/pts and /dev/shm > inside of the chroot, but that's unnecessary now with the bind mount > of the host's /dev.
The bind-mount of /dev isn't what makes it unnecessary. That's why section 6.2.3 still exists -- we still have to mount devpts separately. And we use the newly-built mount for this since it exists in /tools/bin, and /tools/bin is at the start of $PATH. (Or at least, I think it should still be first.) What I don't know is whether we could get away with using the host's mount binary instead, if we didn't do util-linux... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHXgv3S5vET1Wea5wRA10BAJ46uuejwSA8pvgNMmUvb+y54oILdwCgoPvc V08ib+Ni5k4buUG2CXSYXjw= =UTxV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
