On 9/10/07, M.Canales.es <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El Lunes, 10 de Septiembre de 2007 19:26, Dan Nicholson escribió: > > > That would be the drawback to this approach. If we do go back to using > > the host's stylesheets, then it should be completely clear in the > > sources (or somewhere else) what version is expected. Possibly we can > > check and enforce this in the Makefile. > > The expected version is defined on the xsl:import statements placed on the top > level stylesheets/ files (see the LFS-6.2 stylesheets for an example), and a > sane system must not remap an explicit DB-XSL version to a different one via > XML catalogs (that is fine for compatible DTDs releases, but never for XSL > versions), thus that should not be an issue.
My fault. Scratch that comment. I have no objection to using the host's stylesheets, then. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
