On 9/10/07, M.Canales.es <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El Lunes, 10 de Septiembre de 2007 06:10, Randy McMurchy escribió: > > > I'm wondering if we shouldn't go back to using "stock" stylesheet > > versions installed locally, and not a version included with the sources? > > Looks like DB-XSL-1.73.2 is good enough to be used as the default base XSL > code for the next months (maybe the next upgrade will be to DB-5 + > DB-XSL-NS-1.74.1, but that is another beast), that is wy I updated the code > to that release instead to the most current snapshot code. > > About going again to system-side installed DB-XSL version, is a matter to > update the version and instrucctions in the BLFS page, and to install > DB-XSL-1.73.2 on all servers that are rendering *LFS books, i.e., quantum, > andiun, and the CLFS servers. > > CC to lfs-dev and clfs-dev to let editor and servers admins opine about this.
Although both methods have their drawbacks, I prefer the current method of using a snapshot in the sources. That makes it more robust against different hosts since we can enforce the version of the stylesheets used. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
