taipan67 wrote: > Bryan Kadzban wrote: > >> I'm going to tentatively vote -1 for package management in LFS -- that >> is, unless it doesn't break my current package management setup >> (pkg-user hint FTW!). If the changes don't break the pkg-user hint, >> then I'd say +1; it's worth a shot at least. DESTDIR=$dest on all the >> packages, for instance, shouldn't hurt if $dest is empty. >> >> >> > Obviously $dest must be "chgrp install && chmod 1775" in such a case... > <snip> > taipan > Actually, the sticky bit isn't really necessary, since the package-user would be doing "rm -r $dest/*" after relocating the files to the live system, thus leaving it empty.
Also, & still slightly OT (sorry), i've been using "strip --strip-unneeded" instead of "strip --strip-all" on the binaries in $dest, as 'man strip' says something about 'relocation symbols' - i don't understand it entirely, but figured better safe than sorry, plus it's what portage does... taipan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
