Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov <at> ums.usu.ru> writes: > > Peter Ennis wrote: > > It would add more value to the project if the build > > passed the implementation tests. I may look at this > > in my "spare time" :) > > > It would also add value to the LSB project if their sample > implementation actually conformed (no implementaion of Man conforms with > FLS and thus LSB) and worked instead of just passing their tests. > > I, therefore, treat LSB as an evil party ...
So what is a roadmap to deal with these issues that makes best use of "spare time" while providing LFS with a world centric (including asian) development direction in contrast to ASCII 7 bit? There has been some discussion already about "dead project" and the Li18nux(put_the_right_standard_here) idea could be an area for future challenge. I am naturally limited in this area with a native english viewpoint. Thanks, Peter -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
