On 5/2/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/30/06, Archaic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 03:36:01PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> >
> > If no one is against this, I will add ed to the required dependencies of
Xorg.
>
> Aaak! Wouldn't a sed to use sed be preferred? Why anyone is still
> relying on ed is beyond me.
I'm really unfamiliar with ed, so I don't know if the ed script would
work correctly as an sed script. I'd be willing to try it, though, as
this is the first time in a longggg time I can recall needing ed.
Going, from memory, I think this sed would fix it
sed -i 's/^ed/sed/' configure
Definitely needs testing, though, the script being used is not a
simple find-and-replace or something like that. I'll look into it.
Just got back from a long weekend vacation, though, so I have so real
life tasks in the queue.
This should probably be reported as a bug to Xorg.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
