On 4/28/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Working with the Tcl update and trying to go ahead and simplify the
instructions and use the 'make install-private-headers' target. For
some background, visit http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/1897
<snip>
3. This ugly sed will change from this:
sed -i -e "s:${DIR}/unix:/usr/lib:" \
-e "s:${DIR}:/usr/include/tcl${V}:" \
-e "s:^TCL_LIB_FILE='libtcl${V}..TCL_DBGX..so':\
TCL_LIB_FILE=\"libtcl${V}\$\{TCL_DBGX\}.so\":" tclConfig.sh
to this:
sed -i -e "s:${PWD}:/usr/lib:" \
-e "s:$(dirname ${PWD}):/usr/include/tcl&tclver;:" \
-e "/TCL_LIB_FILE/ s:':\":g" \
tclConfig.sh
I trimmed way too much, and I don't know where to jump in, but here's
my contribution. I've only tested the expect build WRT to using `make
install-private-headers', and I don't use tcl otherwise. Putting that
change in is low priority, and after reading this thread, my interest
is waning because this package looks like a hackfest.
For comparison, RedHat installs all the headers in generic and unix.
They also perform a similar sed on tclConfig.sh to knock out the build
directory.
sed -i -e "s|$PWD/unix|%{_libdir}|;
s|$PWD|%{_includedir}/%{name}-private|"
%buildroot/%{_libdir}/%{name}Config.sh
There are some rpm-isms in that sed as well as a reference to
include/tcl-private, which is a custom location where they stuff the
headers besides what gets installed into /usr/include by default.
Here's the spec:
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tcl/tcl.spec?view=markup
--
Dan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
