On 4/7/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 16:23 -0600, Archaic wrote: > > > Add inotify.h and a newer kernel. ;) There are patches for inotify > > support for the llh used in trunk, but I don't recall where. > > Sorry to be so lame in my knowledge about this stuff, but where does > one get inotify.h? And exactly what version of the kernel?
I believe inotify got into the released version of the kernel in 2.6.13. So, you could get the header from there. Otherwise, here's a spot I found them: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/inotify/headers/ Some more savvy user will have to explain whether those are sane for userspace or not. > And if you had to guess, will this be in LFS soon (the appropriate > headers and a kernel that works with inotify). I'm asking all this > because I wan't to see what it will take to get KDE and GNOME all > working when each is expecting a different API/ABI from DBus/HAL. Depends what happens with the kernel sanitization mess. Both Jürg and Jim's scripts undoubtedly would include them as well as any other userspace headers since 2.6.12.0. Jürg's headers have been tested on paldo, so you could ask him about that. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
