On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, J�rg Billeter wrote:
On Sam, 2006-03-18 at 08:56 +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Then better make linux/compiler.h an empty file.
If you want to go for best compatibility, sure; I currently aim to get
the header set as clean as possible, i.e. applications including
unnecessary header files shall break. For LFS, compatibility is probably
better for now, though.
Jürg
FWIW, I couldn't compile glibc-2.4 on x86 (CLFS-style) in the absence
of linux/compiler.h (using 2.6.16-rc6).
Ken
--
das eine Mal als Trag�die, das andere Mal als Farce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
