Dan Nicholson wrote:
Very interesting. So, on gcc-4 with PPC, you don't have a separate spec
called *dynamic_linker ? Because on x86, it looks like this:
*dynamic_linker:
/tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2
(Obviously, I already did the adjustment.) I suppose LFS could leave the
^ out. Just seemed most accurate at the time. We could probably drop it
to be more generic
Except LFS isn't expected to be used on other platforms. That's what
CLFS is for.
Dragos, when you get to the Ch. 6 Readjustment, you will have to change a
couple of the commands because they specifically referenct ld-linux.so.2,
which you obviously don't have. Probably have to drop a ^ there, too.
--
Dan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
