Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > Moving vim up in the order is only a personal preference and goes > against the entire purpose of this change, IMHO. We're trying to show by > the order itself, what depends on what. Nothing *depends* on vim, so > leave it at the end.
There are several options: build vim early, open another window, use scripts like jhalfs. If we are going to an alphabetical approach, then lets leave vim at the end. Choices 2 and 3 above don't need it early and users are free to do 1 if they want. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
