On 3/2/06, Gerard Beekmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Could you guys check your findings against what is being rendered in > http://linuxfromscratch.org/~jhuntwork/lfs-alphabetical
I'll try to look tonight and see if what's in the bug is in the book. > As I understand it, ICA, tool-chain build methodologies, and related > issues have been verified to be in order and won't be effected by > implementing the changes of this ticket. As the order is now, there's no regression from the current SVN build. Testing was done with recursive building (ICA) and binary diffing (both simple from Greg's gsbuild scripts and with Ken Moffat's farce tool). > Dependency lists are being worked on if I understand correctly but > aren't completed yet. If there are lists-in-progress, please post them > so no duplicate work is going to be done (since it can be quite the time > consuming task, nobody wants to waste their time). Chris is uncovering new dependencies all the time. (Un)Fortunately, he's recently uncovered a couple test suite dependencies that will probably require some changes to the build order. Anyone is welcome to go to the bottom of ticket 684 (http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/684) and comment on the libtool/autoconf/automake issues. Gerard, some time ago you said you like to have Vim built as early as possible. Is this still the case? I believe it can be moved right after the current location of Readline without suffering any regressions. So, the status depends on two things: 1. Chris needs to give his opinion on whether the dependencies have been exhausted or not. 2. We need to decide on a final order given the libtool/autoconf/automake business and the location of Vim. After this is decided, I'll kick off another ICA run to make sure everything builds as expected. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
