Justin R. Knierim wrote these words on 02/12/06 22:54 CST: > If you think Bugzilla is > better, it would have been really helpful if you tested Trac when > politely asked to try it during the RFC phase so that everyone can hear > the complaints and decide yes or no.
I voiced one opinion on Trac as it pertained to the functionality issues I am bringing about now. And that opinion was that we could not fairly determine Trac's ability because it was on a different server with different responsiveness. Now that the production implementation is in use, I am disappointed in it. I could not voice this opinion before because, as many noted, it was impossible to test it accurately. I am simply making opinions, and looking for answers. Not *one* of my issues was addressed, other than I go fix things myself, and only then if I have permission from all the other devs for the things that are minor and can be fixed by someone with "admin" privy to BLFS Trac. In Trac, I can't even reference a prior point as #2 without it making a link to a previous trac bug, I point this out, and it goes unaddressed. This is unacceptable to not even give an answer to a legitimate issue. Instead, a flaming starts. And I did not start it. The archives will show this. It was started when someone called another "someone's boy". Them's fighting words where I come from. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 22:57:00 up 141 days, 8:21, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.11 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
